A multicentre, propensity score matched analysis comparing a valve-sparing approach to valve replacement in aortic root aneurysm: Insight from the AVIATOR database

Author:

Arabkhani Bardia1ORCID,Klautz Robert J M1ORCID,de Heer Frederiek2ORCID,De Kerchove Laurent3ORCID,El Khoury Gebrine3ORCID,Lansac Emmanuel4ORCID,Schäfers Hans-Joachim5ORCID,El-Hamamsy Ismail6,Lenoir Marien6,Aramendi José I7ORCID,Meuris Bart8ORCID,Verbrugghe Peter8ORCID,Kluin Jolanda9ORCID,Koolbergen Dave R9,Bouchot Olivier10ORCID,Rudez Igor11,Kolesar Adrian12ORCID,van Brakel Thomas J1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) , Leiden, The Netherlands

2. AVIATOR registry, Heart Valve Society , The Netherlands

3. Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc , Bruxelles, Belgium

4. Institut Mutualiste Montsouris , Paris, France

5. Homburg-Saarland University Medical Center , Homburg, Germany

6. Montréal Heart Institute , Montréal, Quebec, Canada

7. Hospital de Cruces , Bilbao, Spain

8. University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven, Belgium

9. Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, Netherlands

10. CHU le Bocage , Dijon, France

11. University Hospital Dubrava , Zagreb, Croatia

12. Regional Hospital “Ca Foncello” , Treviso, Italy

Abstract

AbstractOBJECTIVESOur goal was to evaluate the outcome of valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) and to compare the outcomes to those of patients having composite valve–graft conduit aortic root replacement (CVG-ARR) in a cohort of patients with aortic root aneurysm ± valve insufficiency, without valvular stenosis. Although valve-sparing procedures are preferable in young patients, there is a lack of comparative data in comparable patients.METHODSThe VSRR procedures were performed in 2005 patients, and 218 patients underwent a CVG-ARR procedure. Exclusion criteria included aortic dissection, endocarditis and valvular stenosis. Propensity score matching (3:1 ratio) was applied to compare VSRR (reimplantation 33% and remodelling 67%) and CVG-ARR.RESULTSWe matched 218 patients with CVG-ARR to 654 patients with VSRR (median age, 56.0; median follow-up was 4 years in both groups; interquartile range 1–5 years). Early mortality was 1.1% of those who had VSRR versus 2.3% in those who had CVG-ARR. Survival was 95.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 94–97%] at 5 years in patients who had VSRR versus 85.4% (95% CI 82–92%) in those who had CVG-ARR; P = 0.002. Freedom from reintervention at 5 years was 96.8% (95% CI 95–98%) with VSRR and 95.4% (95% CI 91–99%) with CVG-ARR (P = 0.98). Additionally, there were more thromboembolic, endocarditis and bleeding events in the patients who had CVG-ARR (P = 0.02).CONCLUSIONSThis multicentre study shows excellent results after valve-sparing root replacement in patients with an ascending aortic aneurysm with or without valve insufficiency. Compared to composite valve-graft aortic root replacement, survival is better and valve-related events are fewer. Consequently, valve-sparing procedures should be considered whenever a durable repair is feasible. We advocate a valve-sparing strategy even in more complex cases when performed in experienced centres.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3