Invited commentary: the choice between mechanical versus biologic mitral valves is becoming clear, what next?
Author:
Affiliation:
1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, CA, USA
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery
Link
https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article-pdf/62/2/ezac198/45180344/ezac198.pdf
Reference10 articles.
1. Biological or mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients 50–70 years of age—a propensity-adjusted analysis;Leviner;Euro J Cardiothorac Surg,2022
2. Mechanical or biologic prostheses for aortic-valve and mitral-valve replacement;Goldstone;N Engl J Med,2017
3. Survival and outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years;Chikwe;JAMA,2015
4. Current evidence for prosthesis selection: what can we really say?;Chiu;J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2019
5. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines;Otto;Circulation,2021
1.学者识别学者识别
2.学术分析学术分析
3.人才评估人才评估
"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370
www.globalauthorid.com
TOP
Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司 京公网安备11010802033243号 京ICP备18003416号-3