Morphology of the left subclavian artery: implications for single-branched endovascular aortic arch repair

Author:

Kondov Stoyan12ORCID,Beyersdorf Friedhelm12ORCID,Braun Nora12,Höhn Rene23ORCID,Schlett Christopher24ORCID,Rylski Bartosz12,Siepe Matthias12ORCID,Kreibich Maximilian12ORCID,Gottardi Roman56ORCID,Czerny Martin12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

2. Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

3. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad, Krozingen, Germany

4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

5. Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Private Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

6. Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Mediclin Heart Institute, Lahr/Baden, Germany

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our goal was to evaluate the morphology of the aortic arch, focusing on the left subclavian artery (LSA), and to anticipate implications for single-branched endovascular aortic arch repair. METHODS We performed a morphological analysis of computed tomography angiography scans of 322 patients between January 2002 and December 2018. Arch type and distance between arch vessels on the convexity were evaluated. We defined 3 morphological types: U-type distance between the left common carotid artery (LCCA) and LSA offspring >10 mm; V-type distance between the LCCA and LSA offspring <10 mm and W-type isolated left vertebral artery offspring from the aortic arch. RESULTS Most patients presented a type III arch [50% (n = 161)]. The median distance from the brachiocephalic trunk offspring to the LCCA offspring measured 2.5 mm (2.0–3.0 mm) and that between the LCCA offspring and the LSA offspring was 6.5 mm (4.0–11.0 mm). We observed no significant difference based on the morphological type (V versus U versus W) in the brachiocephalic trunk–LCCA distance, but there were significant differences in the LCCA–LSA distance between types V and U (P < 0.001) and between types V and W (P < 0.001). Interestingly, we found no significant difference in the LCCA–LSA distance between types U and W. We noted a significant difference in the median diameter of the LSA according to U, V and W types: V type versus U type, 12.5 vs 13.5 mm (P = 0.033) as well as U type versus W type, 13.5 vs 10.5 mm (P < 0.001) and V type versus W type, 12.5 vs 10.5 mm (P < 0.002). The distances between the LSA offspring and left vertebral artery offspring between types U and V did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS Our categorization of the U, V and W types of the LSA can help us anticipate shapes and distances and thereby function as an initial evaluation tool for predicting single branched endovascular aortic arch repair involving the LSA.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

Reference18 articles.

1. The collateral network concept: a reassessment of the anatomy of spinal cord perfusion;Etz;J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2011

2. Anatomy of spinal cord blood supply in the pig;Strauch;Ann Thorac Surg,2007

3. Cervical debranching in the endovascular era: a single centre experience;Konstantinou;Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2019

4. Results of endografting of the aortic arch in different landing zones;Melissano;Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2007

5. Single aortic branch device: the Mona LSA experience;Rousseau;J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino),2019

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3