Comparative efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS Related scientific databases were searched until December 2018. We conducted a pairwise and a network meta-analysis within a frequentist framework, measuring 30-day bleeding, stroke and all-cause mortality. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve was estimated to rank the therapies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was performed. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018111163). RESULTS Eight studies comprising 2173 patients were analysed. The risk of 30-day bleeding was higher for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) than single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) [odds ratio (OR) 1.90 (1.10–3.28); P = 0.02], whereas there was no difference in the risk of 30-day stroke [OR 1.27 (0.38–4.20); P = 0.69] and mortality [OR 1.46 (0.67–3.22); P = 0.34] between DAPT and SAPT. In the network meta-analysis, DAPT + oral anticoagulant (OAC) increased the risk of 30-day bleeding compared with SAPT [OR 6.21 (1.74–22.17); P = 0.005], DAPT [OR 3.27 (1.04–10.32); P = 0.043], SAPT + OAC [OR 4.87 (2.51–9.45); P < 0.001] and OAC [OR 14.4 (1.3–154.7); P = 0.028]. Additionally, patients receiving DAPT + OAC had the highest risks for 30-day bleeding (SUCRA 1.0%). OAC seemed to be superior to SAPT and DAPT in terms of 30-day bleeding (SUCRA OAC: 86.3%, SAPT: 72.3%, DAPT: 32.3%) and stroke (SUCRA 54.2%, 47.4%, 40.5%), but not mortality (SUCRA 69.6%, 74.1%, 43.4%). CONCLUSIONS There is a trend towards less bleeding with the application of SAPT, but no mortality benefit with the application of DAPT is shown. The comparison of SAPT, DAPT and OAC shows that OAC may improve the balance between stroke and bleeding, which can reduce the risk of mortality. In addition, the application of DAPT + OAC was ranked the worst amongst all treatment modalities and should be avoided due to an increased risk of bleeding. Clinical trial registration number PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42018111163).