Affiliation:
1. University of Messina
2. University of Kent
3. www.jontemple.org.uk; e-mail: jon.temple@zohomail.eu
Abstract
Abstract
Should agriculture or non-agriculture be a priority for development? We revisit this question using a two-sector, three-factor dynamic model with an asymptotic balanced growth path. The model allows a forward-looking assessment of development priorities based on lifetime welfare. A comparison of sector-specific productivity gains indicates that gains in non-agriculture are often more valuable, even when agriculture is initially the largest sector in terms of employment. We discuss the robustness of this result and how international capital mobility, capital intensity, demographics, the discount rate, and taxes on profits influence investment and structural transformation.
Funder
the Economic and Social Research Council and the Department for International Development
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献