A Multicenter Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Meter System in Critically Ill Patients

Author:

Nichols James H1,Brandler Ethan S2,Fantz Corinne R3,Fisher Kimberley4,Goodman Michael D5,Headden Gary6,Hoppensteadt Debra7,Matika Ryan8,Peacock W Frank9,Rodrigo John10,Schützenmeister Andre11,Swanson Jonathan R12,Canada-Vilalta Cristina13,Miles Gabrielle14,Tran Nam10

Affiliation:

1. Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA

2. Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA

3. Roche Diagnostics Corporation, US Medical and Scientific Affairs, Indianapolis, IN, USA

4. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

5. University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

6. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

7. Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA

8. University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson, AZ, USA

9. Ben Taub General Hospital, Houston, TX, USA

10. UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA

11. Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany

12. University of Virginia Children’s Hospital, Charlottesville, VA, USA

13. Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Clinical Operations, Indianapolis, IN, USA

14. Roche Diagnostics Operations US, Biostatistics and Data Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Our purpose was to evaluate the performance of the ACCU-CHEK® Inform II blood glucose monitoring system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) compared with the perchloric acid hexokinase (PCA-HK) comparator method on the cobas® 6000 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd) in critically ill patients. Methods Overall, 476 arterial (376 pediatric/adult, 100 neonate), 375 venous, and 100 neonatal heel-stick whole-blood samples were collected and evaluated from critical care settings at 10 US hospitals, including the emergency department, medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs), and neonatal and pediatric ICUs. The ACCU-CHEK Inform II system was evaluated at 2 cutoff boundaries: boundary 1 was ≥95% of results within ±12 mg/dL of the reference (samples with blood glucose <75 mg/dL) or ±12% of the reference (glucose ≥75 mg/dL), and boundary 2 was ≥98% of results within ±15 mg/dL or ±15% of the reference. Clinical performance was assessed by evaluating sample data using Parkes error grid, Monte Carlo simulation, and sensitivity and specificity analyses to estimate clinical accuracy and implications for insulin dosing when using the ACCU-CHEK Inform II system. Results Proportions of results within evaluation boundaries 1 and 2, respectively, were 96% and 98% for venous samples, 94% and 97% for pediatric and adult arterial samples, 84% and 98% for neonatal arterial samples, and 96% and 100% for neonatal heel-stick samples. Clinical evaluation demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity, with low risk of potential insulin-dosing errors. Conclusions The ACCU-CHEK Inform II system demonstrated clinically acceptable performance against the PCA-HK reference method for blood glucose monitoring in a diverse population of critically ill patients in US care settings.

Funder

Roche Diagnostics International Ltd

Rotkreuz

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3