Affiliation:
1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angles , Los Angeles, CA , United States
2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angles , Los Angeles, CA , United States
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Karius Test (KT), a cell-free DNA metagenomic next-generation sequencing assay, has potential to improve diagnostic evaluation of infectious diseases. Published data describing clinical impact of positive KT results are limited. We attempt to elucidate the clinical interpretation and impact of positive KT results based on types and patterns of detected pathogens and patient characteristics.
Methods
All positive KT results from a single institution in 2022 were screened. Patients with results that met predefined categories were included for review by a panel of 3 infectious diseases physicians and one clinical microbiologist. Predefined categories included reports with fungal, parasitic, notable bacterial, notable viral pathogens, or polybacterial results (≥3 bacteria). Polybacterial results were further classified into patterns of microbiome detected. Clinical impact and its correlation with result or patient characteristics were explored.
Results
Ninety-two patients met the inclusion criteria, most were immunocompromised (73%). Positive KT results that met predefined categories had the following clinical impact: positive in 30.4%, negative in 2.2%, and none in 65.2%. Polybacterial results, especially interpreted as oral flora had lowest clinical impact (7.1% and 0.0%, respectively), while detection of parasites or notable bacterial pathogens had the highest clinical impact (100% and 77.8%, respectively). There was no correlation between patient characteristics and clinical impact.
Conclusions
Among a cohort of largely immunocompromised patients, we were able to demonstrate clinical impact of specific KT result types and patterns but did not find correlation between patient characteristics and clinical impact. Our results should be confirmed in future larger cohorts.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)