Assessing Phlebotomy Device Preference and Specimen Quality in an Oncology Outpatient Clinic

Author:

Merrill VeRonika D1,Ward Matthew D1,Diaz-McNair Jovita1,Pickett Elizabeth A1,Duh Show-Hong1,Christenson Robert H1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Oncology patients have frequent venipunctures, which causes scarring, making subsequent draws difficult and painful. Novel blood collection systems may decrease discomfort in patients experiencing repeat blood draws. Methods Oncology outpatients (n = 101; criteria excluded 12) were recruited to determine their preference for either of two blood collection systems, the 23-gauge standard BD Vacutainer Push Button Blood Collection Set (Standard Push Button system) or the 25-gauge BD Vacutainer UltraTouch Push Button Blood Collection Set (UltraTouch Push Button system). Subjects received two blinded, randomized blood draws, one with each device and just one device for each arm. Subjects subsequently rated their blinded preference for blood collection system. Specimen quality was assessed for each device with measurements for plasma hemoglobin (Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer, Shimadzu), lactate dehydrogenase, and potassium (Vitros 4600/5600 analyzer, Ortho Diagnostics). Results Preference for the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system over the 23-gauge Standard Push Button system was significant (UltraTouch, n = 51; Standard n = 30; no preference, n = 8; P = 0.0196). Regarding sample quality, the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system had significantly lower plasma hemoglobin (average 5.34 mg/dL) vs the 23-gauge Standard Push Button system (9.37 mg/dL; P < 0.0001); serum lactate dehydrogenase and potassium differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion Subjects in an oncology clinic preferred phlebotomy with the 25-gauge UltraTouch Push Button system, and samples using this device had less hemolysis as assessed by plasma hemoglobin.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference13 articles.

1. Evaluation of pain and specimen quality by use of a novel 25-gauge blood collection set with ultra-thin wall cannula and 5-bevel tip design;Mouser;J Appl Lab Med,2017

2. Challenges of the oncology draw;Lynn;MLO Med Lab Obs,2011

3. Vascular access in oncology patients;Gallieni;CA Cancer J Clin,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3