“I would I had that corporal soundness”: Pervez Rizvi's Analysis of the Word Adjacency Network Method of Authorship Attribution

Author:

Egan Gabriel1,Eisen Mark2,Ribeiro Alejandro3,Segarra Santiago4

Affiliation:

1. School of Humanities, De Montfort University , Leicester, UK

2. Intel, Santa Clara, California , USA

3. Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

4. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University , Houston, Texas, USA

Abstract

Abstract In his two-part article ‘An Analysis of the Word Adjacency Network Method—Part 1—The evidence of its unsoundness’ and ‘Part 2—A true understanding of the method’ Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38: 347-78 (2022), Pervez Rizvi attempts to replicate the Word Adjacency Network (WAN) method for authorship attribution and show that it does not produce the new knowledge that we, its inventors, claim for it. In the present essay, we will show that Rizvi misrepresents fundamental aspects of the WAN method, that his attempted replication fails not because the method is flawed but because he erred in replicating it, and that Rizvi misunderstands key aspects of the mathematics of Information Theory that the method uses.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Information Systems

Reference18 articles.

1. Computational forensic authorship analysis: promises and pitfalls;Argamon;Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito,2018

2. How the Word Adjacency Network (WAN) algorithm works;Brown;Digital Scholarship in the Humanities,2022

3. Stylometric analysis of early modern English plays;Eisen;Digital Scholarship in the Humanities,2018

4. Cicero, Sigonio, and Burrows: investigating the authenticity of the Consolatio;Forsyth;Literary and Linguistic Computing,1999

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. False statements in Egan et al.’s defence of their word adjacency network method;Digital Scholarship in the Humanities;2024-01-10

2. A reply to Pervez Rizvi’s letter;Digital Scholarship in the Humanities;2024-01-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3