Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners

Author:

Addison M1ORCID,Kaner E1,Johnstone P2,Hillier-Brown F3,Moffatt S1,Russell S1,Barr B4,Holland P5,Salway S6,Whitehead M4,Bambra C1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK

2. Public Health England, North of England, Blenheim House, West One, Leeds LS1 4PL, UK

3. Department of Sport and Exercise, Durham University, 42 Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HN, UK

4. Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK

5. Lecturer in Public Health, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Furness Building, Lancaster LA1 4YG, UK

6. Department of Sociological Studies, The University of Sheffield, Elmfield, Northumberland Road, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background The Equal North network was developed to take forward the implications of the Due North report of the Independent Inquiry into Health Equity. The aim of this exercise was to identify how to reduce health inequalities in the north of England. Methods Workshops (15 groups) and a Delphi survey (3 rounds, 368 members) were used to consult expert opinion and achieve consensus. Round 1 answered open questions around priorities for action; Round 2 used a 5-point Likert scale to rate items; Round 3 responses were re-rated alongside a median response to each item. In total, 10 workshops were conducted after the Delphi survey to triangulate the data. Results In Round 1, responses from 253 participants generated 39 items used in Round 2 (rated by 144 participants). Results from Round 3 (76 participants) indicate that poverty/implications of austerity (4.87 m, IQR 0) remained the priority issue, with long-term unemployment (4.8 m, IQR 0) and mental health (4.7 m, IQR 1) second and third priorities. Workshop 3 did not diverge from findings in Round 1. Conclusions Practice professionals and academics agreed that reducing health inequalities in the North of England requires prioritizing research that tackles structural determinants concerning poverty, the implications of austerity measures and unemployment.

Funder

Centre for Translational Research in Public Health

UK Clinical Research Collaboration

Economic and Social Research Council

Medical Research Council

National Institute for Health Research

National Institute of Health Research

Department of Health

Universities of Sheffield

Imperial and University College London

Newcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences Research Ethics Committee

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Health divides

2. North and South: addressing the English health divide;Bambra;J Public Health (Oxf),2014

3. The north-south health divide;Whitehead;Br Med J,2011

4. Investigating the impact of the English health inequalities strategy: time trend analysis;Barr;BMJ (Online),2017

5. Trends in mortality from 1965 to 2008 across the English north-south divide: comparative observational study;Hacking;Br Med J,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3