COVID-19 pandemic: health impact of staying at home, social distancing and ‘lockdown’ measures—a systematic review of systematic reviews

Author:

Chiesa Valentina12,Antony Gabriele3,Wismar Matthias4,Rechel Bernd5

Affiliation:

1. Local Health Unit of Reggio Emilia, Via Giovanni Amendola, 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy

2. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine London, WC1H 9SH, 15-17 Tavistock Place, United Kingdom

3. Austrian National Public Health Institute (Gesundheit Österreich GmbH, GÖG)

4. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Place Victor Horta 40/10, 1060 Brussels, Belgium

5. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1H 9SH, 15-17 Tavistock Place, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Background To systematically review the evidence published in systematic reviews (SR) on the health impact of staying at home, social distancing and lockdown measures. We followed a systematic review approach, in line with PRISMA guidelines. Methods In October 2020, we searched the databases Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and Web of Science, using a pre-defined search strategy. Results The literature search yielded an initial list of 2172 records. After screening of titles and abstracts, followed by full-text screening, 51 articles were retained and included in the analysis. All of them referred to the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The direct health impact that was covered in the greatest number (25) of SR related to mental health, followed by 13 SR on healthcare delivery and 12 on infection control. The predominant areas of indirect health impacts covered by the included studies relate to the economic and social impacts. Only three articles mentioned the negative impact on education. Conclusions The focus of SR so far has been uneven, with mental health receiving the most attention. The impact of measures to contain the spread of the virus can be direct and indirect, having both intended and unintended consequences. Highlights

Funder

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

Reference53 articles.

1. Systematic rapid living review on rehabilitation needs due to COVID-19: update to May 31st, 2020;Andrenelli;Eur J Phys Rehabil Med,2020

2. Systematic rapid "living" review on rehabilitation needs due to COVID-19: update to march 31st, 2020;Ceravolo;Eur J Phys Rehabil Med,2020

3. How satisfied are patients and surgeons with telemedicine in orthopaedic care during the COVID-19 pandemic? A systematic review and meta-analysis;Chaudhry;Clin Orthop Relat Res,2020

4. A guide to physiotherapy in urogynecology for patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic;Ferreira;Int Urogynecol J

5. Application of telemedicine during the coronavirus disease epidemics: a rapid review and meta-analysis;Gao;Ann Translat Med,2020

Cited by 93 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3