Demographic and socio-economic inequalities in subjective wellbeing: analysis of repeated cross-sectional health surveys in England 2010–2019

Author:

Castelletti C12ORCID,Ogunlayi F3,Miret M145,Lara E456,Oyebode  37

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid , Calle Arzobispo Morcillo 4, Madrid 28029, Spain

2. Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa) , Calle Diego de León 62, Madrid 28006, Spain

3. Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL, UK

4. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental , CIBERSAM, , Av. Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Madrid 28029, Spain

5. Instituto de Salud Carlos III , CIBERSAM, , Av. Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Madrid 28029, Spain

6. Department of Personality, Evaluation and Clinical Psychology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid , Campus de Somosagua, Ctra. de Húmera, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid 28223, Spain

7. Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London , London EC1M 6BQ, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Good subjective wellbeing (SWB) is a key societal aspiration. The study of SWB determinants is of increasing interest. The present study aimed to examine national inequalities in SWB, and trends in these inequalities, for England across five demographic (sex and age) and socio-economic (educational level, household income and living alone) characteristics. Method The relative index of inequalities (RII) and slope index of inequalities (SII) were calculated from repeated cross-sectional data from the Health Survey for England from 2010 to 2019 (excluding 2017 and 2018 as our outcome variable was not collected in these years), in a total of 90 236 participants aged 16+. SWB was assessed using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), treated as a dichotomous variable with high and low levels of SWB > 40 and ≤ 40, respectively. Results There were significant inequalities in SWB by income (RII from 1.086 to 1.116), educational level (RII from 0.893 to 0.941) and between people living alone or not (RII from 0.908 to 0.937). The RII and SII trends were not statistically significant. Conclusions Higher socio-economic status could play a protective role for SWB, and people in the most deprived socio-economic positions may be at higher risk for low SWB. These associations have remained stable over time.

Funder

NHS Digital

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference40 articles.

1. Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing;Steptoe;The Lancet,2015

2. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being;Ryan;Annu Rev Psychol,2001

3. Dimensions of subjective well-being;Kapteyn;Social indicators research,2015

4. Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?;Blanchflower;Social science medicine,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3