Nutrient enrichment of human milk with human and bovine milk–based fortifiers for infants born weighing <1250 g: a randomized clinical trial

Author:

O'Connor Deborah L123,Kiss Alex45,Tomlinson Christopher1627,Bando Nicole1,Bayliss Ann8,Campbell Douglas M679,Daneman Alan1011,Francis Jane12,Kotsopoulos Kirsten3,Shah Prakesh S73,Vaz Simone12,Williams Brock1,Unger Sharon673

Affiliation:

1. Translational Medicine Program and Divisions of Neonatology and Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

2. Departments of Nutritional Sciences, Pediatrics, and Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

3. Department of Pediatrics, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada

4. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

5. Evaluative and Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

6. Translational Medicine Program and Divisions of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

7. Departments of Pediatrics and Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

8. Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Canada

9. St. Michael's Hospital and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Canada

10. Translational Medicine Program and Divisions of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

11. Departments of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

12. Department of Pediatrics, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Canada

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Human milk-based fortifiers (HMBFs) are being adopted in neonatal care to enrich the nutrients in human milk for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants despite being costly and there being limited efficacy data. No randomized clinical trial has evaluated the use of HMBF compared with bovine milk–based fortifiers (BMBFs) in the absence of formula feeding. Objective To determine if HMBF compared with BMBF for routine nutrient enrichment of human milk improves feeding tolerance, reduces morbidity, reduces fecal calprotectin (a measure of gut inflammation), and supports the growth of infants &lt;1250 g. Design In this blinded randomized clinical trial, infants born weighing &lt;1250 g were recruited from neonatal units in Ontario, Canada between August 2014 and November 2015. The infants were fed mother's milk and donor milk as required. Fortification commenced at 100 mL/kg per day of HMBF (0.81 kcal/mL) or BMBF (0.72 kcal/mL) and advanced at 140 mL/kg per day to 0.88 and 0.78 kcal/mL, respectively. The primary outcome was percentage of infants with a feeding interruption for ≥12 h or a &gt;50% reduction in feeding volume. Secondary outcomes included a dichotomous mortality and morbidity index (i.e., affirmative for any one of death, late-onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, chronic lung disease, or severe retinopathy of prematurity), fecal calprotectin, and growth. Results Of 232 eligible infants, 127 (54.7%) were randomized (n = 64 HMBF, n = 63 BMBF). Mean ± SD birth weight and gestational age of infants were 888 ± 201 g and 27.7 ± 2.5 wk, respectively. No statistically significant differences were identified in feeding interruptions [17/64 HMBF, 20/61 BMBF; unadjusted risk difference: −6.2% (95% CI: −22.2%, 9.8%)]. There was no statistically significant difference in the mortality and morbidity index (35.9% HMBF, 49.2% BMBF, adjusted P = 0.07), changes in fecal calprotectin, or growth z scores. Conclusions Among infants born weighing &lt;1250 g and exclusively fed human milk, the use of HMBF did not improve feeding tolerance or reduce mortality and morbidity compared with BMBF. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02137473.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 93 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3