Good practice in food-related neuroimaging

Author:

Smeets Paul A M12ORCID,Dagher Alain3ORCID,Hare Todd A4,Kullmann Stephanie5,van der Laan Laura N6,Poldrack Russell A7,Preissl Hubert5ORCID,Small Dana8,Stice Eric9,Veldhuizen Maria G8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, NL

2. Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands

3. Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

4. Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

5. Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, German Center for Diabetes Research, Tübingen, Germany

6. Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

7. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

8. Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

9. Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of neuroimaging tools, especially functional magnetic resonance imaging, in nutritional research has increased substantially over the past 2 decades. Neuroimaging is a research tool with great potential impact on the field of nutrition, but to achieve that potential, appropriate use of techniques and interpretation of neuroimaging results is necessary. In this article, we present guidelines for good methodological practice in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies and flag specific limitations in the hope of helping researchers to make the most of neuroimaging tools and avoid potential pitfalls. We highlight specific considerations for food-related studies, such as how to adjust statistically for common confounders, like, for example, hunger state, menstrual phase, and BMI, as well as how to optimally match different types of food stimuli. Finally, we summarize current research needs and future directions, such as the use of prospective designs and more realistic paradigms for studying eating behavior.

Funder

European Union Seventh Framework Programme

NIH

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3