Affiliation:
1. Department of Management, Birkbeck, University of London
2. Department of Economics, University College London
3. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge
Abstract
Abstract
When the same person is described as a 'Capitalist Revolutionary' and a ‘Bourgeois Marxist’, you know that there is a tug of war going on between opposing ideologies to claim the ideas of that person: in this case, John Maynard Keynes. James Crotty, in his recent book, Keynes against Capitalism, joins the game. Crotty takes issue with the conventional interpretation: that Keynes was trying to save capitalism. Instead, he argues that from the mid-1920s until his death in 1946, Keynes consistently argued for replacing capitalism with ‘liberal socialism’. Crotty also maintains that The General Theory was designed to provide the theoretical foundation in support of his case against capitalism, in favour of liberal socialism. We contend that these labels, however clear they might have been to Keynes, are now laden with all sorts of interpretive baggage, and that Keynes’s thinking was rather too subtle and complex to be comfortably described by them. To make this case, we examine the social purpose that Keynes’s theoretical and policy work was designed to achieve and the means by which he thought it could best be achieved, as his thinking developed in the context of the rapidly changing times through which he lived.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference56 articles.
1. Keynes and capitalism,;Backhouse;History of Political Economy,,2009
2. Capitalist Revolutionary
3. Secular stagnation: the history of a macroeconomic heresy,;Backhouse;The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,,2016
4. Corporatism, capitalism and depression in twentieth-century Britain,;Booth;The British Journal of Sociology,1982
5. Britain in the 1930s: a managed economy?;Booth;The Economic History Review,,1987
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献