Affiliation:
1. Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro. Centro de Estudios en Ciencia, Tecnología, Cultura y Desarrollo, CONICET, Argentina and CONICET, Argentina
Abstract
Abstract
In the brief preface to A Treatise on Probability, Keynes states, ‘It may be perceived that I have been greatly influenced by W. E. Johnson, G. E. Moore and Bertrand Russell, that is, by Cambridge, which, with great debts to the writers of Continental Europe, yet continues in direct succession the English tradition of Locke, Berkeley and Hume, of Mill and Sidgwick’ (J. M. Keynes, 1921, p. v). The authors who have recently stressed the relevance of Keynes ideas on probability have paid special attention to the influence of the former, but not to that of the latter. This article intends to show that the Treatise on Probability is deeply rooted in the history of probabilistic thinking, particularly in the Early Enlightenment (roughly between 1650 and 1750), before mathematicians claimed ownership over the subject. We find that important aspects of Keynes’ notions were already present in Locke and other Early Enlightenment writers, albeit with some note-worthy differences.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference39 articles.
1. Continuity and change in Keynes’s thought: the importance of Hume;Andrews;Journal of the History of Economic Thought,1999
2. High pressure and black clouds: Keynes and the frequentist theory of probability;Baccini;Cambridge Journal of Economics,2004
3. Keynes’s changing conception of probability;Bateman;Economics and Philosophy,1987
4. G.E. Moore and J.M. Keynes: a missing chapter in the history of the expected utility model;Bateman;The American Economic Review,1988
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献