Abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates whether the application of the latest guidance of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for regulating cryptocurrencies may engender unintended consequences at odds with the initial purposes of transparency and technology neutrality. For instance, we will ask whether regulation strengthening may incite a category of investors to flight to unregulated and non-compliant decentralised exchange platforms to stay under the radar of regulators. Furthermore, we ask whether regulation may lead to a two-tier industry, fragmented between compliant trading venues that attract mainstream users and non-compliant trading venues that attract privacy-centric users. We argue that somewhat paradoxically, regulation may push part of the crypto-industry to the ‘dark side’ of financial innovation and drives privacy-centric investors out of the scope of regulators.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference79 articles.
1. Asset pricing with liquidity risk;Acharya;Journal of Financial Economics,2005
2. Blockchain and investment: an Austrian approach;Allen;The Review of Austrian Economics,2020
3. The illiquidity premium: international evidence;Amihud;Journal of Financial Economics,2015
4. An analysis of Uniswap markets;Angeris,2019
5. A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy;Aragón-Correa;Academy of Management Review,2003
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献