Affiliation:
1. Health Policy Commission , USA
2. Northeastern University , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Political frictions significantly affect both pricing and supply in the long-term care insurance (LTCI) market. Comparing the same insurer’s requests submitted for the same policy at the same time to different state regulators, we find that they are 13% more likely to be approved and receive 4% more of the requested amount after an election year. Over time, regulatory pushback on premium increase requests leads to persistently lower cash reserves and increases the probability of company dropout. An insurer who receives one-standard-deviation less of their requested increase is 20% more likely to leave the market next year.
Received April 1, 2021; editorial decision July 16, 2023 by Editor Ralph Koijen. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference41 articles.
1. When should you adjust standard errors for clustering?;Abadie;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2023
2. Robust post-matching inference;Abadie;Journal of the American Statistical Association,2022
3. Inconsistent regulators: Evidence from banking;Agarwal;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2014
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献