Key factors in complex public health interventions to address vaccine hesitancy using a multidisciplinary approach: the VAX-TRUST project

Author:

Ferrara Maria1,Langiano Elisa1,Esposito Maurizio1,Lo Moro Giuseppina2ORCID,Lombardi Rosalia1,Vuolanto Pia3,De Vito Elisabetta1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human, Social and Health Sciences, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio , Cassino, Italy

2. Department of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin , Turin, Italy

3. Research Centre for Knowledge, Science, Technology and Innovation Studies of Tampere University , Tampere, Finland

Abstract

Abstract The VAX-TRUST project addresses vaccine hesitancy in seven European countries with a systematic and evidence-based approach. Interventions, targeting healthcare professionals, draw from behavioural and social theories. A checklist, inspired by the TIDieR (Template for Intervention Description and Replication), ensures a detailed description of actions, transparency and replicability. The intervention development process begins with collaborative meetings and systematic revisions, concluding with external evaluations for replicability in diverse public health contexts. This study aims to provide valuable insights for future complex interventions in public health, based on lessons learnt to reduce the risk of vaccine-preventable diseases. The analysis of educational interventions within the VAX-TRUST project has led to the definition of precise guidelines to ensure their replicability and adaptation to various contexts, attempting to establish a universally applicable approach. Active participant engagement and consideration of local social dynamics, beyond information transmission, have emerged as key factors to improve intervention effectiveness. Various educational tools and collaboration with academic institutions have contributed to strengthening credibility.

Funder

European Union

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference39 articles.

1. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance;Craig;BMJ,2008

2. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare;O’Cathain;BMJ Open,2019

3. Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012;Larson;Vaccine,2014

4. Vaccine hesitancy and healthcare providers;Paterson;Vaccine,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3