Critical assessment of computational tools for prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoter prediction

Author:

Zhang Meng1,Jia Cangzhi1,Li Fuyi23,Li Chen2ORCID,Zhu Yan1,Akutsu Tatsuya4,Webb Geoffrey I56,Zou Quan7,Coin Lachlan J M3,Song Jiangning26ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Science, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China

2. Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia

3. The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia

4. Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan

5. Department of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia

6. Monash Data Futures Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia

7. Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

Abstract

Abstract Promoters are crucial regulatory DNA regions for gene transcriptional activation. Rapid advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have accelerated the accumulation of genome sequences, providing increased training data to inform computational approaches for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoter prediction. However, it remains a significant challenge to accurately identify species-specific promoter sequences using computational approaches. To advance computational support for promoter prediction, in this study, we curated 58 comprehensive, up-to-date, benchmark datasets for 7 different species (i.e. Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Arabidopsis thaliana, Zea mays and Drosophila melanogaster) to assist the research community to assess the relative functionality of alternative approaches and support future research on both prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters. We revisited 106 predictors published since 2000 for promoter identification (40 for prokaryotic promoter, 61 for eukaryotic promoter, and 5 for both). We systematically evaluated their training datasets, computational methodologies, calculated features, performance and software usability. On the basis of these benchmark datasets, we benchmarked 19 predictors with functioning webservers/local tools and assessed their prediction performance. We found that deep learning and traditional machine learning–based approaches generally outperformed scoring function–based approaches. Taken together, the curated benchmark dataset repository and the benchmarking analysis in this study serve to inform the design and implementation of computational approaches for promoter prediction and facilitate more rigorous comparison of new techniques in the future.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Molecular Biology,Information Systems

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3