Affiliation:
1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
2. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Multigene panel testing (MGPT) has become a critical component of cancer risk assessment in clinical practice. As technology and access improve and costs decrease, more individuals than ever are undergoing MGPT for genetic evaluation. One gene that deserves special consideration when included on MGPT is CDH1, which codes for the cell-cell adhesion protein E-cadherin. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic germline variants in CDH1 have been associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome, and in highly penetrant families, testing for these variants is critical for proper risk management. However, recent data demonstrated that gastric cancer penetrance in unselected CDH1 carriers may be lower than expected. Further complicating matters are the lack of effective screening strategies for gastric cancer and recommendation for risk-reducing total gastrectomy in CDH1 carriers. Therefore, the discovery of an unexpected pathogenic or likely pathogenic CDH1 variant on multigene panel testing, when testing for CDH1 would not normally be considered based on personal or family history alone, creates dilemmas for both patients and providers. In this commentary, we highlight the potential for unexpected CDH1 variants on MGPT, outline the uncertainties associated with these variants, and emphasize the importance of pretest counseling regarding the potential for an unexpected CDH1 variant. Although CDH1 testing is often important for clinical decision-making, individuals and providers need to be aware of the potential for an unexpected CDH1 variant when CDH1 is included on MGPT for cancer risk assessment.
Funder
National Institutes of Health
National Insitute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference29 articles.
1. Cost-effectiveness of population-based BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 mutation testing in unselected general population women;Manchanda;J Natl Cancer Inst,2018
2. Next-generation sequencing panels for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and polyposis syndromes: a cost-effectiveness analysis;Gallego;J Clin Oncol,2015
3. Cancer susceptibility gene mutations in individuals with colorectal cancer;Yurgelun;J Clin Oncol,2017
4. Identification of a variety of mutations in cancer predisposition genes in patients with suspected Lynch syndrome;Yurgelun;Gastroenterology,2015
5. Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2, 000 patients;LaDuca;Genet Med,2014
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献