The Association Between Medicare Low-Income Subsidy and Anticancer Treatment Uptake in Advanced Lung Cancer

Author:

Chou Yi-Ting1ORCID,Farley Joel F2,Stinchcombe Thomas E3,Proctor Amber E45,Lafata Jennifer Elston16,Dusetzina Stacie B78ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

2. Department of Pharmaceutical Care & Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

3. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC

4. Department of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC

5. Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

6. UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

7. Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN

8. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN

Abstract

Abstract Background High out-of-pocket costs may impact anticancer treatment uptake. The Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) program can reduce patient out-of-pocket cost for Medicare Part D–covered treatments. We examined whether the LIS increased uptake and reduced time to initiate orally administered anticancer drugs in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, we identified older adults (aged 65 years and older) diagnosed with advanced NSCLC from 2007 through 2013 and categorized them as full LIS, partial LIS, or non-LIS. We used propensity-score weighted (IPTW) Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the likelihood of and time to initiate Part D treatments. Part B medication uptake was our negative control because supplemental insurance reduces out-of-pocket costs for those drugs. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Among 19 746 advanced NSCLC patients, approximately 10% initiated Part D treatments. Patients with partial or no LIS were less likely to initiate Part D treatments than were those with full subsidies (partial LIS vs full LIS HRIPTW = 0.77, 95% confidence interval = 0.62 to 0.97; non-LIS vs full LIS HRIPTW = 0.87, 95% confidence interval  = 0.79 to 0.95). Time to initiate Part D treatments was also slightly shorter among full-LIS patients (full LIS mean [SD] = 10.8 [0.04] months; partial LIS mean [SD] = 11.3 [0.08] months; and non-LIS mean [SD] = 11.1 [0.03] months, P < .001). Conversely, patients with partial or no LIS had shorter time to initiation of Part B drugs. Conclusions Patients receiving the full LIS had higher orally administered anticancer treatment uptake than patients without LIS. Notably, patients with partial LIS had the lowest treatment uptake, likely because of their low incomes combined with high expected out-of-pocket spending. High out-of-pocket costs for Part D medications may be a barrier to treatment use for patients without full LIS.

Funder

CER Strategic Initiative of UNC’s Clinical &Translational Science

UNC School of Medicine

California Department of Public Health

National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program

Cancer Prevention Institute of California

University of Southern California

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference32 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3