Abstract
Abstract
In this article we depart from the classic model of foreign direct investment (FDI) determinants and examine the effect of sociohistorical factors on FDI. We argue that past foreign aid projects confer social capital that constitutes specific resources available to investors in the present, increasing their preferences for host countries in which their home country has accumulated more social capital. We use new data on China's historical aid in Africa to test these contentions, uncovering a positive, significant connection between China's historical aid program in Africa (1956–1999) and contemporary (2000–2015) investments by Chinese companies. While China's historical aid may have been politically driven, it has had important long-term consequences for its commercial investors. More broadly, these findings suggest a sociohistorical explanation of the puzzle of why Chinese foreign investments deviate from conventional FDI patterns.
Funder
Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference93 articles.
1. Constructivism as an Approach to International Political Economy;Abdelal,2009
2. Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data;Bailey;Journal of Conflict Resolution,2017
3. What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data;Beck;American Political Science Review,1995
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献