Dose–response association between animal protein sources and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Talebi Sepide12ORCID,Ghoreishy Seyed Mojtaba34ORCID,Ghavami Abed5,Sikaroudi Masoumeh Khalighi2,Nielsen Sabrina Mai67,Talebi Ali8,Mohammadi Hamed2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Students’ Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran

2. Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran

3. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran

4. Student Research Committee, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran

5. Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Isfahan, Iran

6. Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital , Copenhagen, Denmark

7. Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital , Odense, Denmark

8. Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Abstract Context There are contradictory findings about the relationship between various animal protein sources and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Objective The purpose of our study was to understand better the associations between total protein, animal protein, and animal protein sources and the risk of developing GDM. Data Sources A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science encompassing the literature up until August 2022. A random-effects model was used to combine the data. For estimating the dose–response curves, a one-stage linear mixed-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Data Extraction Data related to the association between animal protein consumption and the risk of GDM in the general population was extracted from prospective cohort studies. Data Analysis It was determined that 17 prospective cohort studies with a total of 49 120 participants met the eligibility criteria. It was concluded with high certainty of evidence that there was a significant association between dietary animal protein intake and GDM risk (1.94, 95% CI 1.42 to 2.65, n = 6). Moreover, a higher intake of total protein, total meat, and red meat was positively and significantly associated with an increased risk of GDM. The pooled relative risks of GDM were 1.50 (95% CI: 1.16, 1.94; n = 3) for a 30 g/d increment in processed meat, 1.68 (95% CI: 1.25, 2.24; n = 2) and 1.94 (95% CI: 1.41, 2.67; n = 4) for a 100 g/d increment in total and red meat, and 1.21 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.33; n = 4) and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.52; n = 3) for a 5% increment in total protein and animal protein, respectively. GDM had a positive linear association with total protein, animal protein, total meat consumption, and red meat consumption, based on non-linear dose–response analysis. Conclusion Overall, consuming more animal protein–rich foods can increase the risk of GDM. The results from the current study need to be validated by other, well-designed prospective studies. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022352303.

Funder

Oak Foundation

Parker Institute’s Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3