Affiliation:
1. Division of Nutritional Sciences, Savage Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Abstract
Abstract
This paper examines the implications of intracultural difference for the design and implementation of nutrition interventions. It raises the question of whether small-sample, mixed-method implementation research, using a focused ethnographic approach, has sufficient power to detect meaningful differences in cultural beliefs, values, perceptions, and attitudes that are important for the design and implementation of nutrition interventions. It first presents the theoretical framework that was used to guide the research, followed by a description of the methodology of the Focused Ethnographic Study for Infant and Young Child Feeding. It then uses the findings from recent research in Ghana to address the central question. The findings document strong elements of shared cultural consensus, but intracultural differences of importance, in relation to the planning and content of behavior change communication.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference30 articles.
1. Mixed Methods in Ethnographic Research
2. Implementation science in nutrition: concepts and frameworks for an emerging field of science and practice;Tumilowicz;Curr Dev Nutr,2018
3. History and significance of the EMIC/ETIC distinction;Harris;Annu Rev Anthropol.,1976
4. Participatory action research;Baum;J Epidemiol Commun Health.,2006
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献