The efficacy of genotype-based dietary or physical activity advice in changing behavior to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, type II diabetes mellitus or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

King Alexandra1ORCID,Graham Catherine A -M23ORCID,Glaister Mark1ORCID,Da Silva Anastacio Viviane1,Pilic Leta1ORCID,Mavrommatis Yiannis1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Sport, Allied Health and Performance Science, St Marys University , London, UK

2. cereneo Foundation, Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CEFIR) , Seestrasse 18, 6354 Vitznau, Switzerland

3. Lake Lucerne Institute , Seestrasse 18, 6354 Vitznau, Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Context Despite clear evidence that adherence to dietary and physical activity advice can reduce the risk of cardiometabolic disease, a significant proportion of the population do not follow recommendations. Personalized advice based on genetic variation has been proposed for motivating behavior change, although research on its benefits to date has been contradictory. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of genotype-based dietary or physical activity advice in changing behavior in the general population and in individuals who are at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched up to January 7, 2022. Randomized controlled trials of a genotype-based dietary and/or physical activity advice intervention that aimed to change dietary and/or physical activity behavior were included. Data Extraction Abstracts of 7899 records were screened, and 14 reports from 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data Analysis Genotype-based dietary or physical activity advice was found to have no effect on dietary behavior in any of the studies (standardized mean difference [SMD] .00 [–.11 to .11], P = .98), even when analyzed by subgroup: “at risk” (SMD .00 [–.16 to .16, P = .99]; general population (SMD .01 [–.14 to .16], P = .87). The physical activity behavior findings were similar for all studies (SMD –.01 [–.10 to .08], P = .88), even when analyzed by subgroup: “at risk” (SMD .07 [–.18 to .31], P = .59); general population (SMD –.02 [–.13 to .10], P = .77). The quality of the evidence for the dietary behavior outcome was low; for the physical activity behavior outcome it was moderate. Conclusions Genotype-based advice does not affect dietary or physical activity behavior more than general advice or advice based on lifestyle or phenotypic measures. This was consistent in studies that recruited participants from the general population as well as in studies that had recruited participants from populations at risk of CVD or T2DM. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021231147.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3