Efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis/inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis: evaluation by comparison with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

Author:

Matsuo Yoshiro1,Yoshida Kenji1,Nishimura Hideki2,Ejima Yasuo1,Miyawaki Daisuke1,Uezono Haruka2,Ishihara Takeaki1,Mayahara Hiroshi2,Fukumoto Takumi3,Ku Yonson3,Yamaguchi Masato4,Sugimoto Koji4,Sasaki Ryohei1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-Cho, Chuou-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe Minimally Invasive Cancer Center, 8-5-1, Minatojima-Nakamachi, Chuou-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0046, Japan

3. Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-Cho, Chuou-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan

4. Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-Cho, Chuou-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) compared with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). Forty-three patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT)/inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis (IVCTT) treated with SBRT (27 with CyberKnife (CK) and 16 with TrueBeam (TB)) from April 2013 to December 2014, and 54 treated with 3DCRT from June 2008 to March 2013 were evaluated. Dosimetric parameters, response to radiotherapy (RT) and survival outcomes were compared in total SBRT vs. 3DCRT, CK vs. 3DCRT and TB vs. 3DCRT, respectively. The median biologically effective dose 10 (BED10) values in total SBRT, CK, TB and 3DCRT were 73.4 Gy10, 75.0 Gy10, 60.5 Gy10 and 58.5 Gy10, respectively (P < 0.001 in total SBRT vs. 3DCRT, P < 0.001 in CK vs. 3DCRT, P = 0.004 in TB vs. 3DCRT). The tumor response rates were 67%, 70%, 62% and 46%, respectively (P = 0.04, P = 0.04, P = 0.25). The 1-year overall survival rates were 49.3%, 56.7%, 38.1% and 29.3%, respectively (P = 0.02, P = 0.02, P = 0.30), and the 1-year local progression rates were 20.4%, 21.9%, 18.8% and 43.6%, respectively (P = 0.01, P = 0.04, P = 0.10). The use of SBRT made it possible to achieve a higher BED10 compared with the use of 3DCRT. Improvements in local control and survival were achieved in the CK group and the total SBRT group. Our results suggest that SBRT may have the potential to be the standard RT technique for the treatment of PVTT/IVCTT.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3