Affiliation:
1. Princeton University , Princeton , United States
Abstract
Abstract
José Benardete developed a famous paradox involving a beginningless set of items each member of which satisfies some predicate just in case no earlier member satisfies it. The Grim Reaper version of this paradox has recently been employed in favour of various finitist metaphysical theses, ranging from temporal finitism to causal finitism to the discrete nature of time. Here, I examine a new challenge to these finitist arguments—namely, the challenge of implying that the future cannot be endless. In particular, I develop future-oriented Benardete paradoxes and examine their epistemic symmetry with past-oriented paradoxes.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference20 articles.
1. ‘Endless Future: A Persistent Thorn in the Kalam Cosmological Argument’;Cohen;Philosophical Papers,2015
2. ‘Cohen on the Kalam Cosmological Argument’;Erasmus;Prolegomena,2016
3. ‘Before-Effect and Zeno Causality’;Hawthorne;Noûs,2000
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献