Affiliation:
1. University of Edinburgh, UK
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper I respond to Marcello Di Bello’s criticisms of the ‘normic account’ of the criminal standard of proof (Di Bello 2019). In so doing, I further elaborate on what the normic account predicts about certain significant legal categories of evidence, including DNA and fingerprint evidence and eyewitness identifications.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference37 articles.
1. The Probable and The Provable
2. ‘The social and legal construction of suspects’;Cole;Annual Review of Law and Social Science,2006
3. ‘Probability analysis of judicial fact-finding’;Cullison;University of Toledo Law Review,1969
4. ‘The corroboration requirement in Scottish criminal trials: Should it be retained for some forms of problematic evidence?’;Davidson;International Journal of Evidence and Proof,2014
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献