Affiliation:
1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA delpinal@illinois.edu
Abstract
Abstract
The logicality of language is the hypothesis that the language system has access to a ‘natural’ logic that can identify and filter out as unacceptable expressions that have trivial meanings—that is, that are true/false in all possible worlds or situations in which they are defined. This hypothesis helps explain otherwise puzzling patterns concerning the distribution of various functional terms and phrases. Despite its promise, logicality vastly over-generates unacceptability assignments. Most solutions to this problem rest on specific stipulations about the properties of logical form—roughly, the level of linguistic representation which feeds into the interpretation procedures—and have substantial implications for traditional philosophical disputes about the nature of language. Specifically, contextualism and semantic minimalism, construed as competing hypotheses about the nature and degree of context-sensitivity at the level of logical form, suggest different approaches to the over-generation problem. In this paper, I explore the implications of pairing logicality with various forms of contextualism and semantic minimalism. I argue that to adequately solve the over-generation problem, logicality should be implemented in a constrained contextualist framework.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference54 articles.
1. ‘Presuppositional and Negative Islands: A Semantic Account’;Abrusán;Natural Language Semantics,2011
2. Weak Island Semantics
3. ‘Content vs. Function Words: The View from Distributional Semantics’;Abrusán,2018
4. ‘Grammaticality and Meaning Shift’;Abrusán;The Semantic Conception of Logic: Essays on Consequence, Invariance, and Meaning,2021
5. ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’;Barwise;Linguistics and Philosophy,1981
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献