Affiliation:
1. Wolfson College , Oxford , UK
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper, I identify a central problem for conceptual engineering: the problem of showing concept-users why they should recognize the authority of the concepts advocated by engineers. I argue that this authority problem cannot generally be solved by appealing to the increased precision, consistency, or other theoretical virtues of engineered concepts. Outside contexts in which we already aim to realize theoretical virtues, solving the authority problem requires engineering to take a functional turn and attend to the functions of concepts. But this then presents us with the problem of how to specify a concept’s function. I argue that extant solutions to this function specification problem are unsatisfactory for engineering purposes, because the functions they identify fail to reliably bestow authority on concepts, and hence fail to solve the authority problem. What is required is an authoritative notion of conceptual function: an account of the functions of concepts which simultaneously shows why concepts fulfilling such functions should be recognized as having authority. I offer an account that meets this combination of demands by specifying the functions of concepts in terms of how they tie in with our present concerns.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference96 articles.
1. ‘A Plea for Excuses’;Austin,1957/1961
2. ‘Success Semantics’.;Blackburn,2005
3. ‘Blind Reasoning’;Boghossian;Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume,2003
4. ‘Explication as a Method of Conceptual Re-engineering’;Brun;Erkenntnis,2016
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献