Affiliation:
1. Uppsala University , Sweden
Abstract
Abstract
There is a dimension of rationality, known as structural rationality, according to which a paradigmatic example of what it means to be rational is not to be akratic. Although some philosophers claim that aesthetics falls within the scope of rationality, a non-akrasia constraint prohibiting certain combinations of attitudes is yet to be developed in this domain. This essay is concerned with the question of whether such a requirement is plausible and, if so, whether it is an actual requirement of aesthetic rationality. Ultimately, this paper defends the view that aesthetics is no different from other domains in that it requires coherence between a subject’s mental states (in the aesthetic case, between what is judged and what is aesthetically liked).
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference50 articles.
1. ‘The way it makes us feel: the subsumption model of the Kantian judgement of taste’;Berger;European Journal of Philosophy,2021
2. Emotional Insight
3. Rationality Through Reasoning
4. ‘Enkrasia’;Broome;Organon F: Medzinárodný Cˇasopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu,2013
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献