Affiliation:
1. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
Abstract
Over-the-counter (OTC) markets attract substantial trading volume despite exhibiting frictions absent in centralized limit-order markets. We compare the efficiency of OTC and limit-order markets when traders’ expertise is endogenous. We show that asymmetric access to counterparties in OTC markets yields increased rents from expertise acquisition for a few well-connected core traders. When the existence of gains to trade is uncertain, traders’ higher expertise in OTC markets can improve allocative efficiency. In contrast, when expertise primarily causes adverse selection, competitive limit-order markets tend to dominate. Our model provides guidance for policy makers and empiricists evaluating the efficiency of market structures.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference79 articles.
1. Counterparty risk externality: Centralized versus over-the-counter markets;Acharya,;Journal of Economic Theory,2014
2. A theory of intraday patterns: Volume and price variability;Admati,;Review of Financial Studies,1988
3. Systemic illiquidity in the federal funds market;Ashcraft,;American Economic Review,2007
4. The market for OTC credit derivatives;Atkeson,;Working Paper,2013
5. Strategic fragmented markets;Babus,;Working Paper,2018
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献