Affiliation:
1. Michigan State University
2. Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Michigan State University
Abstract
Abstract
We study blockholder presence in a large panel and document substantial heterogeneity in holding periods, position sizes, and positions taken across blockholder types. Nonfinancial blocks are more likely to be observed in smaller, riskier, younger, and less-liquid firms. These patterns are either not evident or reversed for financial blocks. For all but small financial blocks, we detect significant negative interdependence in blockholder investment decisions, with the presence of one blockholder crowding out others, a behavior that appears causal. Small financial blocks often coexist in the same firm, an outcome that appears to reflect correlated investment styles.
Received April 30, 2018; editorial decision November 23, 2018 by Editor David Denis.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference61 articles.
1. The “Wall Street Walk” and shareholder activism: Exit as a form of voice;Admati,;Review of Financial Studies,2009
2. Equity ownership, strategic alliances, and product market relationships;Allen,;Journal of Finance,2000
3. Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects;Amihud,;Journal of Financial Markets,2002
4. Connected stocks;Anton,;Journal of Finance,2014
5. Passive investors, not passive owners;Appel,;Journal of Financial Economics,2016
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献