Transforming science and society? Methodological lessons from and for transformation research

Author:

Hölscher Katharina1,Wittmayer Julia M1,Hirschnitz-Garbers Martin2,Olfert Alfred3,Walther Jörg4,Schiller Georg3,Brunnow Benjamin3

Affiliation:

1. Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Mandeville Building, 16th floor, Burgmeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam 3062 PA, The Netherlands

2. Ecologic Institute, Pfalzburger Str. 43-44, 10717 Berlin, Germany

3. Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER), Dresden 01217, Germany

4. Brandenburg University of Technology (BTU) Cottbus-Senftenberg, Platz der Deutschen Einheit 1, 03046 Cottbus, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Transformation research has in the past years emerged as a shared lens to study and support radical societal change towards sustainability. Given the nascent and exploratory—yet highly normative and ambitious—character of transformation research, we aim to enhance the understanding of transformation research: when do research designs qualify as transformation research, what is needed for putting transformation research into practice, and what are results? To this end, we develop a framework that identifies criteria for designing and reflecting on research results, design and processes as transformation research. We employ this framework to reflect on our work in a research project that was designed in the spirit of transformation research: The TRAFIS (Transformations towards resource-conserving and climate-resilient coupled infrastructures) project sought to understand and support the development of innovative coupled infrastructures to mobilize their critical role in achieving sustainability transformations. Our results yield lessons and recommendations about what transformation research looks like in practice and how it can be strengthened, focussing on 1, redefining and re-valuing research for societal impact; 2, redesigning research to integrate perspectives on radical societal change; and 3, re-equipping researchers and research partners for social learning. We conclude that while transformation research already contributes to framing and generating knowledge about real-world sustainability challenges, its transformative impact is still limited. Practicing transformation research requires far-reaching changes in the science system, but also continuous reflection about legitimacy, power relations, and impacts.

Funder

German Environment Agency

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education

Reference88 articles.

1. Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-Actor Perspective;Avelino;J. Environ. Policy Planning,2015

2. Transformative Social Innovation and (Dis)Empowerment;Avelino;Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2019

3. Action Research in Policy Analysis

4. Toward an Integrative Perspective on Social Learning in System Innovation Initiatives;Beers;Ecology and Society,2016

5. Defining and Assessing Research Quality in a Transdisciplinary Context;Belcher;Research Evaluation,2016

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3