A participatory method to assess the contribution of agricultural research to societal changes in developing countries

Author:

Faure Guy12,Blundo-Canto Genowefa12ORCID,Devaux-Spatarakis Agathe123,Le Guerroué Jean Louis14,Mathé Syndhia25,Temple Ludovic12,Toillier Aurélie26,Triomphe Bernard27,Hainzelin Etienne8

Affiliation:

1. CIRAD, UMR INNOVATION, 78 avenue Jean-François Breton, Montpellier F-34398, France

2. Univ Montpellier, Place Eugène Bataillon, Montpellier F-34090, France

3. Quadrant Conseil, 5bis rue Martel, Paris F-75010, France

4. University of Brasilia, Darcy Ribero 70910, 900 Brasilia, Brazil

5. CIRAD, UMR INNOVATION, Rue J. Ellig Essono Balla, BP 2572 Yaoundé, Cameroon

6. CIRAD, UMR INNOVATION, Avenue Kennedy, 01 BP 596, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

7. CIRAD, UMR INNOVATION, San Francisco 1514, 03200 Mexico, Mexico

8. CIRAD Presidency, Avenue Agropolis, Montpellier F-34398, France

Abstract

Abstract Over the last decade, societal pressure has increased on public research agencies to provide evidence that their research contributes to achieve development goals. To address this challenge, the French Agricultural Research Center for International Development (Cirad), developed an ex-post impact assessment method based on the impact pathway approach, called Impact of Research in the South (ImpresS). The reconstruction of the impact pathway identifies and assesses research outputs, outcomes, and impacts on development over long-time spans, taking into account the contribution of other stakeholders, projects, and contextual factors. By applying mixed methods and participatory approaches, ImpresS involves key actors in assessing the contribution of research to impacts in innovation processes. Such a participatory approach raises, however, questions about the advantages and disadvantages of participation in impact assessment. This article examines whether and how participation affects the results of an evaluation and the methodological challenges this poses. The analysis is based on 13 case studies covering different innovation processes, countries, and time spans. The main results show that participation, combined with triangulation of information including quantitative and qualitative data, strengthens the explanation of the causal relationships among outputs, outcomes, and impacts. It helps reveal a large and diversified list of impacts based on the perception of actors, especially uncovering positive and negative impacts unexpected by researchers. However, participation may render other impacts less visible, especially those related to environmental and political issues. Furthermore, participatory evaluation entangles challenges linked to expectations, divergent perceptions, power dynamics, and social inequality, which must be carefully addressed to provide robust and transparent evaluation results.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3