Warnings of declining research productivity: Does Italy buck the trend?

Author:

Abramo Giovanni1ORCID,D’Angelo Ciriaco Andrea2

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory for Studies in Research Evaluation, Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi e Informatica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche , Via dei Taurini 19 , Roma 00185, Italy

2. Laboratory for Studies in Research Evaluation (IASI-CNR), Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Impresa, Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata” , Via del Politecnico 1 , Roma 00133, Italy

Abstract

Abstract The paper takes a scientometric approach to measure the change in research productivity of Italian academics before the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. We propose a composite output/input bibliometric indicator and apply it at the field level, conducting a longitudinal analysis. Although the number of academics in the national academic system has decreased, we register very strong growth in both the number of publications and their scholarly impact. The growth in productivity, with only rare exceptions, crosses almost all fields. However, in areas that are traditionally very internationalized (Biology, Physics, and Chemistry), growth is less sustained than overall average, and also the variability of productivity across fields seems reduced. The main reason for this detail would be the smaller margins for improvement in the fields that had already reached high international standing. What emerges from the analysis goes counter to some alarms of declining scientific productivity at the global level. The Italian case is partly explained by the historic adoption of policies aimed at strengthening competitive mechanisms, in particular through the introduction of systems of performance-based research funding, and bibliometric accreditation for professorship.

Funder

Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education

Reference44 articles.

1. Revisiting the Scientometric Conceptualization of Impact and Its Measurement;Abramo;Journal of Informetrics,2018

2. How Do You Define and Measure Research Productivity?;Abramo;Scientometrics,2014

3. A Novel Methodology to Assess the Scientific Standing of Nations at Field Level;Abramo;Journal of Informetrics,2020

4. The Different Responses of Italian Universities to Introduction of Performance-Based Research Funding;Abramo;Research Evaluation,2021

5. Comparison of Research Productivity of Italian and Norwegian Professors and Universities;Abramo;Journal of Informetrics,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3