Hyaluronic acid and urology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The use of hyaluronic acid as a nonsurgical treatment for various conditions within urology has been of great interest in recent literature. Objectives In this study, we aimed to provide an updated review and analysis of the current state of hyaluronic acid use in urology, characterize its adverse effects, and briefly discuss future directions of research for hyaluronic acid in urology. Methods PubMed searches were run utilizing multiple terms, including “hyaluronic acid,” “penile,” “augmentation,” “Peyronie disease,” “premature ejaculation,” and “cosmetic urology,” among other related iterations. Relevant data extracted included International Index of Erectile Function score, intravaginal ejaculatory latency, glans circumference, penile girth, and plaque size. We also included studies which reported on complications of hyaluronic acid injections. Aggregated analysis was performed on studies with complete pre and post injection data at time closest to 6 months postinjection. Results A total of 33 studies met our inclusion criteria. Studies had marked heterogeneity in design, but most reported positive results. A total of 16 studies were included in our analysis. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency, penile girth, glans circumference, and International Index of Erectile Function were all increased on a fixed-effects model. Reduction in plaque size was not significant (P = .069). Complications were rare. Conclusion Literature on hyaluronic acid for urologic issues demonstrates promising results; however, the quality of studies was variable. Our analysis of these studies largely corroborates these findings; however, the results are limited by the data available. Hyaluronic acid may be promising, but we highly implore standardization of study regimens in randomized controlled trials.