The Revised PENIS Score and proposal of the PACKAGE Checklist: a meta-epidemiologic study on penile amputation and replantation

Author:

Tran Aimee A1,Machado Bruno L C1,Kuykendall Kennedy H1,Spencer Horace J1,Scherzer Nickolas D1,Almajed Wael S2,Saghir Norman3,Saghir Reyan4,Hellstrom Wayne J G2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR 72223 , United States

2. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Tulane University , New Orleans, Louisiana 70112 , United States

3. Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Wythenshawe Hospital , Manchester , United Kingdom

4. Department of General Surgery, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Trust , Huddersfield , United Kingdom

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPenile amputation causes severe physical and psychosocial distress. Microsurgical implementation in penile replantation is presumed to be superior to surgical repair. This assumption has been difficult to verify.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was threefold: (1) to produce an updated review of penile replantation, substantiated by the largest sample size to date; (2) to appraise the comparative value of the novel PENIS Score and propose the PACKAGE Checklist, a guide for standardization of future case reports and reviews; and (3) to improve confusing terminology and recommend the standardization of vocabulary.MethodsA literature review assessed 432 full-text case reports in 20 languages and identified 123 microsurgical and 40 surgical cases of penile replantation. The novel PENIS Score stratified penile amputations based on 5 criteria: position along the shaft, extension through the penis, neurovascular repair, ischemia time and type, and severed edge condition and contamination. For the outcome measurements, a Kendall tau coefficient evaluated the association between each PENIS criterion for short-term postoperative complications and 3 outcome measures: erection, urination, and sensation.ResultsLess than half of surgical reports on penile replantation are sufficiently detailed to complete all PENIS Score criteria. The viability of microsurgical and surgical replantation was equivalent at 92% and 94%, respectively. A statistically significant correlation was found between microsurgical repair and the return of sensation but not with nerve repair. Return of sensation with nerve repair was 51%, and microsurgical replantation without nerve repair was 42%; both were significantly higher than the 14% for surgical replantation. Preservation of a skin bridge was associated with a 40% reduction in severe postoperative complications.ConclusionMicrosurgical replantation is superior in return of sensation, with or without nerve repair. Implementing the PACKAGE Checklist and PENIS Score will help inform case reports and reviews.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Urology,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine,Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference45 articles.

1. A case of self-amputation of penis by cannabis induced psychosis;Khan;J Forensic Leg Med,2012

2. Klingsor syndrome: a rare surgical emergency;Aggarwal;Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg,2017

3. A rare case of complete male genital self-amputation posing challenges in the psychiatric diagnosis and management;Tsanakalis;Heliyon,2021

4. A case of Klingsor syndrome in Korea;Park;Psychiatry Clin Neurosci,2011

5. Surgical management of an epidemic of penile amputations in Siam;Bhanganada;Am J Surg,1983

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3