Effectiveness of interventions targeting air travellers for delaying local outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2

Author:

Clifford Samuel1ORCID,Pearson Carl A B12,Klepac Petra1,Van Zandvoort Kevin1,Quilty Billy J1,Eggo Rosalind M1,Flasche Stefan1,

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT London, UK

2. South African DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), University of Stellenbosch, 19 Jonkershoek Road, Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa

Abstract

Abstract Background We evaluated if interventions aimed at air travellers can delay local severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) community transmission in a previously unaffected country. Methods We simulated infected air travellers arriving into countries with no sustained SARS-CoV-2 transmission or other introduction routes from affected regions. We assessed the effectiveness of syndromic screening at departure and/or arrival and traveller sensitisation to the COVID-2019-like symptoms with the aim to trigger rapid self-isolation and reporting on symptom onset to enable contact tracing. We assumed that syndromic screening would reduce the number of infected arrivals and that traveller sensitisation reduces the average number of secondary cases. We use stochastic simulations to account for uncertainty in both arrival and secondary infections rates, and present sensitivity analyses on arrival rates of infected travellers and the effectiveness of traveller sensitisation. We report the median expected delay achievable in each scenario and an inner 50% interval. Results Under baseline assumptions, introducing exit and entry screening in combination with traveller sensitisation can delay a local SARS-CoV-2 outbreak by 8 days (50% interval: 3–14 days) when the rate of importation is 1 infected traveller per week at time of introduction. The additional benefit of entry screening is small if exit screening is effective: the combination of only exit screening and traveller sensitisation can delay an outbreak by 7 days (50% interval: 2–13 days). In the absence of screening, with less effective sensitisation, or a higher rate of importation, these delays shrink rapidly to <4 days. Conclusion Syndromic screening and traveller sensitisation in combination may have marginally delayed SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in unaffected countries.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Health Data Research UK Innovation Fellowship

National Institute for Health Research

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Elrha’s Research for Health in Humanitarian Crises

Department for International Development

Wellcome Epidemic Preparedness Coronavirus Research Programme

Neglected Tropical Disease

London Interdisciplinary Doctoral Programme

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. Airport screening for Ebola;Mabey;BMJ,2014

2. Entry and exit screening of airline travellers during the a(H1N1) 2009 pandemic: a retrospective evaluation;Khan;Bull World Health Organ,2013

3. Entry screening to delay local transmission of 2009 pandemic influenza a (H1N1);Cowling;BMC Infect Dis,2010

4. International travels and fever screening during epidemics: a literature review on the effectiveness and potential use of non-contact infrared thermometers;Bitar;Euro Surveill,2009

5. Estimated effectiveness of symptom and risk screening to prevent the spread of COVID-19;Gostic;Elife,2020

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3