Cognitive mechanisms and resilience in UK-based general practitioners: cross-sectional findings

Author:

Kaleta F O1ORCID,Kristensen C B1,Duncan M1,Crutchley P2,Kerr P3,Hirsch C R14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. King’s College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience , London SE5 4AF , UK

2. Harrow Community Mental Health Team, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL) , Bentley House, Harrow HA3 5QX , UK

3. Cornerways Surgery , Bromley BR3 5LG , UK

4. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital , Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, Kent BR3 3BX , UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBeing a general practitioner (GP) is a stressful occupation, and the strain GPs are under can have negative effects on their psychological well-being, as well as on the patients’ experience of healthcare. Resilience can help buffer against this and is a dynamic process by which one can cope with adversity and stress.AimsThis study aimed to identify modifiable cognitive mechanisms related to resilience in GPs, specifically interpretation bias and cognitive reappraisal.MethodsOne hundred and fourteen GPs completed an online cross-sectional correlational study. This comprised questionnaires assessing resilience, emotional distress, work environment and cognitive mechanisms (emotion regulation), as well as a task assessing interpretation bias.ResultsResilience of GPs was negatively correlated with measures of emotional distress. Furthermore, resilience was positively correlated with positive interpretation bias (r = 0.60, ρ = 0.60, P < 0.01) and cognitive reappraisal (r = 0.39, ρ = 0.40, P < 0.01). In a hierarchical regression, positive interpretation bias (B = 0.25, SE B = 0.06, β = 0.39, P < 0.01) was a significant independent predictor of resilience when controlling for depression, anxiety and stress.ConclusionsThis is the first study to establish an association between resilience and positive interpretation bias and cognitive reappraisal in GPs. Future research should use longitudinal designs to determine if they have a causal role in promoting resilience, and importantly whether interventions focusing on these processes may foster resilience in less resilient GPs.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

King’s College London

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3