Hospital clinicians’ psychosocial well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal study

Author:

Wynter Karen12ORCID,Holton Sara12ORCID,Trueman Melody3,Bruce Suellen4,Sweeney Sue3,Crowe Shane3,Dabscheck Adrian5,Eleftheriou Paul5,Booth Sarah6,Hitch Danielle6,Said Catherine M678,Haines Kimberley J6ORCID,Rasmussen Bodil12910

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, 3220 , Australia

2. The Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Western Health Partnership, St Albans, 3021 , Australia

3. Nursing and Midwifery, Western Health, St Albans, 3021 , Australia

4. People, Culture and Communications, Western Health, Footscray, 3021 , Australia

5. Medical Services, Western Health, St Albans, 3021 , Australia

6. Allied Health, Western Health, St Albans, 3021 , Australia

7. Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010 , Australia

8. Australian Institute of Musculoskeletal Sciences, St Albans, 3021 , Australia

9. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark and Steno Diabetes Center, Odense, 5230 , Denmark

10. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 1165 , Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Background Hospital clinicians report poor psychosocial well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Few studies have reported data at more than one time point. Aims To compare psychosocial well-being among hospital clinicians at two different time points during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Methods Participants included doctors, nurses, midwives and allied health clinicians at a multi-site, public health service in Melbourne, Australia. Data were collected via two cross-sectional, online surveys: May to June (wave 1; n = 638) and October to December 2020 (wave 2; n = 358). The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) assessed psychological well-being in the past week. Investigator-devised questions assessed COVID-19 concerns and perceived work impacts. General linear models were used to assess impact of wave on psychological distress. Results There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. Both positive (e.g. learning experience) and negative (e.g. risk of getting COVID-19) impacts were reported. In both waves, staff were most concerned about health risks to family members. Wave 2 respondents were significantly more likely than wave 1 respondents to indicate concerns about colleagues having COVID-19, increased workloads, leave cancellation and increased conflict at work (all P < 0.001). Adjusting for sex, age, self-rated health and discipline group, depression, anxiety and stress scores were significantly higher for respondents in the second than the first wave (all P < 0.001). Conclusions Psychological well-being of hospital clinicians was significantly worse during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic than the first. Sustained occupational and psychosocial support is recommended even when immediate COVID-19 concerns and impacts resolve.

Funder

Deakin University

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3