Subgroup analyses in clinical research: too tempting?

Author:

Groenwold Rolf H H12ORCID,Dekkers Olaf M13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, 2333 ZA , the Netherlands

2. Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, 2333 ZA , the Netherlands

3. Department of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, 2333 ZA , the Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract In many biomedical studies, subgroup analyses are performed to identify subgroups of patients in whom a treatment is most effective, or a risk factor has the largest effect. While both are referred to as subgroup analysis, it is important to distinguish between the estimation of effects within subgroups and the comparison of effects across subgroups. Both are discussed, and we outline the implications regarding sample size and statistical methods for estimation of effects. Also, the risk of false-positive findings—which potentially increases with subgroup analysis—is discussed, as well as the distinction between effect modification and interaction.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Endocrinology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Reference7 articles.

1. The (mis)use of overlap of confidence intervals to assess effect modification;Knol;Eur J Epidemiol,2011

2. Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test;Brookes;J Clin Epidemiol,2004

3. Multiple testing: when is many too much?;Groenwold;Eur J Endocrinol,2021

4. Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses;Sun;BMJ,2010

5. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group;Lancet,1988

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3