Vote Choice and the Nonseparability of Economic and Social Issues

Author:

Stoetzer Lukas F1,Zittlau Steffen1

Affiliation:

1. Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Abstract How voters use political issues to elect political candidates is of central importance to our understanding of democratic representation. Research on voting behavior often assumes that American voters hold distinct economic and cultural issue preferences. In this research note, we point out that this does not necessarily imply that preferences for candidates’ positions on the two issue dimensions are also additively separable in voters’ decisions. Analyzing survey data on US presidential elections from 1996 to 2016, we estimate to what extent voters’ economic and socio-cultural preferences are nonseparable and find that the two general dimensions act as substitutes in their decisions. Our finding implies that voting decisions are partially structured by an underlying single dimension, as liberal deviations from a voter’s ideal point on social issues can be compensated by conservative deviations on economic issues.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,History,Communication

Reference23 articles.

1. “Purple America.”;Ansolabehere;Journal of Economic Perspectives,2006

2. “What’s the Matter with What’s the Matter with Kansas?”;Bartels;Quarterly Journal of Political Science,2006

3. “Social Choice in a Representative Democracy.”;Benoit;American Political Science Review,1994

4. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.”;Davis;American Political Science Review,1970

5. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.”;Downs;Journal of Political Economy,1957

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Sources of data;The Universal Republic;2024-07-02

2. List of Tables;The Universal Republic;2024-07-02

3. List of Figures;The Universal Republic;2024-07-02

4. Regression tables;The Universal Republic;2024-07-02

5. Goodness-of-fit statistics;The Universal Republic;2024-07-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3