Relevant dimensions to give meaning to pension decisions

Author:

Strikwerda Jelle1ORCID,Holleman Bregje1ORCID,Hoeken Hans1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht University , Utrecht , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Pension participants face complex decisions. Information about the decision alternatives often contains the exact monetary amounts associated with the alternatives. Grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT), we argue that informed decision making requires participants to (accurately) understand meaningful differences between decision alternatives, rather than to rely on purely numerical differences in amounts. The objective of this study was to identify, for three decisions Dutch participants can make regarding their old-age pension, what dimensions participants take into account when giving meaning to the decision alternatives. We conducted 39 semi-structured in-depth interviews with Dutch pension participants in which we discussed the considerations of participants to choose for the decision alternatives. These interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Our analysis shows that a number of dimensions are taken into account, partially overlapping for the three decisions: life expectancy, (in)sufficient income, financial maximization, work–life balance, and job satisfaction. According to FTT, participants can be supported in extracting meaningful representations by providing cues about the dimensions that might be affected by the various decision alternatives. The dimensions identified in this paper can serve as a useful starting point for such support.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference39 articles.

1. Understanding retirement requires getting inside people’s stories: A call for more qualitative research;Amabile,2019

2. Thinking and Deciding

3. Working after retirement: Features of bridge employment and research directions;Beehr,2015

4. Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence;Bekker,2013

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3