Comparison of 30- and 90-Day Mortality Rates in Patients with Cultures Positive for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter in Atlanta, 2011–2015

Author:

Sexton Mary Elizabeth12,Bower Chris234,Sukumaran Stephen234,Jacob Jesse T125

Affiliation:

1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia;

2. Georgia Emerging Infections Program, Decatur, Georgia;

3. Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia;

4. Atlanta Research and Education Foundation, Decatur, Georgia;

5. Emory Antibiotic Resistance Center, Atlanta, Georgia

Abstract

Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) pose a threat to public health, but comparisons of disease burden are limited. We compared survival in patients following cultures positive for CRE or CRAB. Methods The Georgia Emerging Infections Program performs active population-based and laboratory-based surveillance for CRE and CRAB in metropolitan Atlanta, GA. Using standard CDC definitions, we included patients who had incident carbapenem-nonsusceptible E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., or Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from urine only (noninvasive infection) or a sterile site (invasive infection) between 8/2011 and 12/2015. Death dates, verified by Georgia Vital Statistics records, were used to calculate 30- and 90-day mortality rates. We used the chi-square test for mortality rates and the log-rank test for survival analysis to 90 days to compare patients with invasive CRAB, noninvasive CRAB, invasive CRE, and noninvasive CRE. Results There were 535 patients with CRE (87 invasive, 448 noninvasive) and 279 (78 invasive, 201 noninvasive) with CRAB. Nearly all patients with CRE and CRAB had healthcare exposures (97.2% vs. 100%) and most were immunosuppressed (62.6% vs. 56.3%). Both 30-day (24.4% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.04) and 90-day (37.6% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.04) mortality were higher in patients with CRAB than CRE. Patients with invasive infections were more likely to die at 90 days than those with noninvasive infections (53.3% vs. 38.4%, p < 0.0001). Overall mortality rates for invasive infection were similar between CRAB and CRE at 30 (44.9% vs. 34.5% p = 0.2) and 90 days (59.0% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.2). Using survival analysis at 90 days, invasive CRAB had the worst outcomes, followed by invasive CRE, noninvasive CRAB and noninvasive CRE 
(p < 0.0001, see Figure). Conclusion Ninety -day mortality for invasive infections with CRE and CRAB was ~50%, and patients with CRAB had lower survival than those with CRE, suggesting that prevention efforts may need to prioritize CRAB as highly as CRE in facilities with endemic CRAB. With the high proportion of healthcare exposures and immunosuppression, these infections may signify poor prognosis or directly contribute to mortality. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3