Exploring training needs of newly graduated medical doctors to inform the undergraduate simulation-based curriculum: a national Delphi consensus study

Author:

Breindahl Niklas1,Khan Farsana1,Skipper Mads2,Nielsen Anders Bo3,Friis Mikkel Lønborg4,Paltved Charlotte5,Jensen Rune Dall5,Kurtzhals Jørgen A L67,Konge Lars18,Nayahangan Leizl Joy1

Affiliation:

1. Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) Center for HR and Education, , Copenhagen 2100, Denmark

2. Postgraduate Medical Education Region North , Viborg 8800, Denmark

3. Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark SimC, , Odense 5000, Denmark

4. Aalborg University Hospital NordSim, , Aalborg 9220, Denmark

5. Central Denmark Region Corporate HR MidtSim, , Aarhus 8200, Denmark

6. University of Copenhagen Department of Immunology and Microbiology, , Copenhagen 2100, Denmark

7. Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet) Department of Clinical Microbiology, , Copenhagen 2100, Denmark

8. University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, , Copenhagen 2100, Denmark

Abstract

AbstractPurposeMastering technical procedures is a key component in succeeding as a newly graduated medical doctor and is of critical importance to ensure patient safety. The efficacy of simulation-based education has been demonstrated but medical schools have different requirements for undergraduate curricula. We aimed to identify and prioritize the technical procedures needed by newly graduated medical doctors.MethodsWe conducted a national needs assessment survey using the Delphi technique to gather consensus from key opinion leaders in the field. In the first round, a brainstorm was conducted to identify all potential technical procedures. In the second round, respondents rated the need for simulation-based training of each procedure using the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation Needs Assessment Formula (CAMES-NAF). The third round was a final elimination and prioritization of the procedures.ResultsIn total, 107 experts from 21 specialties answered the first round: 123 unique technical procedures were suggested. Response rates were 58% and 64% in the second and the third round, respectively. In the third round, 104 procedures were eliminated based on the consensus criterion, and the remaining 19 procedures were included and prioritized. The top five procedures were: (i) insert peripheral intravenous catheter, (ii) put on personal protection equipment, (iii) perform basic airway maneuvers, (iv) perform basic life support, and (v) perform radial artery puncture.ConclusionBased on the Delphi process a final list of 19 technical procedures reached expert consensus to be included in the undergraduate curriculum for simulation-based education.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3