Abstract
AbstractA growing body of critical scholarship interrogates racism in international relations. Yet many introductory undergraduate courses reproduce the colonial and racist foundations and practices of the discipline for new students of global politics. This article argues that, to engage seriously racism in international relations, scholars must rethink undergraduate curriculum and pedagogy. To this end, I offer an alternative model of teaching introductory international relations courses. I propose reading the disciplinary canon alongside, through, and against the texts of Black internationalists. This diverse intellectual and political tradition provides ways to (re)claim the study of race, racism, and Black liberation struggles as international politics. In doing so, Black internationalism allows international relations scholars to radically rethink our curricula, our classrooms, our pedagogy, and the politics of knowledge-making more broadly.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference95 articles.
1. “The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism.”;Agathangelou;International Studies Review,2004
2. “Nuclear Imperialism and the Pan-African Struggle for Peace and Freedom: Ghana, 1959–1962.”;Allman;Souls,2008
3. “Underdevelopment and Dependence in Black Africa—Origins and Contemporary Forms.”;Amin;The Journal of Modern African Studies,1972
4. “Colonialism and the Birth of International Institutions: Sovereignty, Economy, and the Mandate System of the League of Nations.”;Anghie;New York University Journal of International Law and Politics,2002
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献