On the Epistemic Status of Prenatal Ultrasound: Are Ultrasound Scans Photographic Pictures?

Author:

Favaretto Maddalena1,Vears Danya F1,Borry Pascal1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract Medical imaging is predominantly a visual field. In this context, prenatal ultrasound images assume intense social, ethical, and psychological significance by virtue of the subject they represent: the fetus. This feature, along with the sophistication introduced by three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging that allows improved visualization of the fetus, has contributed to the common impression that prenatal ultrasound scans are like photographs of the fetus. In this article we discuss the consistency of such a comparison. First, we investigate the epistemic role of both analogic and digital photographic images as visual information-providing representations holding a high degree of objectivity. Second, we examine the structure and process of production of ultrasound scans and argue that a comparison between two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound and photography is justified. This is in contrast to 3D ultrasound images that, due to the intensive mathematical processing involved in their production, present some structural issues that obfuscate their ontological and epistemic status.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference48 articles.

1. Epistemic function and ontology of analog and digital images;Alcaraz;Contemporary Aesthetics,2016

2. The limits of photography;Benovsky;International Journal of Philosophical Studies,2014

3. Decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormality;Bijma;Reproductive Health Matters,2008

4. Three-dimensional ultrasound volume calculations of human embryos and young fetuses: A study on the volumetry of compound structures and its reproducibility;Blaas;Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology,2006

5. Seeing the baby: The impact of ultrasound technology;Black;Journal of Genetic Counseling,1992

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. “A Picture Paints a Thousand Words”—A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues of Prenatal Ultrasound;Journal of Bioethical Inquiry;2024-08-19

2. MAKING SENSE OF THE IMAGE-MAKING FROM VISUALIZING TO VISIBILIZING THE LIVING MATTER;RETI SAPERI LINGUAGG;2023

3. The Normative Significance of Empirical Moral Psychology;Diametros;2020-06-30

4. The Ends of Medicine and the Experience of Patients;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine;2020-03-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3