Affiliation:
1. Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
Medical imaging is predominantly a visual field. In this context, prenatal ultrasound images assume intense social, ethical, and psychological significance by virtue of the subject they represent: the fetus. This feature, along with the sophistication introduced by three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging that allows improved visualization of the fetus, has contributed to the common impression that prenatal ultrasound scans are like photographs of the fetus. In this article we discuss the consistency of such a comparison. First, we investigate the epistemic role of both analogic and digital photographic images as visual information-providing representations holding a high degree of objectivity. Second, we examine the structure and process of production of ultrasound scans and argue that a comparison between two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound and photography is justified. This is in contrast to 3D ultrasound images that, due to the intensive mathematical processing involved in their production, present some structural issues that obfuscate their ontological and epistemic status.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference48 articles.
1. Epistemic function and ontology of analog and digital images;Alcaraz;Contemporary Aesthetics,2016
2. The limits of photography;Benovsky;International Journal of Philosophical Studies,2014
3. Decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormality;Bijma;Reproductive Health Matters,2008
4. Three-dimensional ultrasound volume calculations of human embryos and young fetuses: A study on the volumetry of compound structures and its reproducibility;Blaas;Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology,2006
5. Seeing the baby: The impact of ultrasound technology;Black;Journal of Genetic Counseling,1992
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献