Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how?

Author:

Pace Andrea1,Koekkoek Johan A F23,van den Bent Martin J4,Bulbeck Helen J5,Fleming Jane6,Grant Robin7,Golla Heidrun8,Henriksson Roger9,Kerrigan Simon10,Marosi Christine11,Oberg Ingela12,Oberndorfer Stefan13,Oliver Kathy14,Pasman H Roeline W15,Le Rhun Emilie16,Rooney Alasdair G17,Rudà Roberta18,Veronese Simone19,Walbert Tobias20,Weller Michael21ORCID,Wick Wolfgang2223ORCID,Taphoorn Martin J B23,Dirven Linda23

Affiliation:

1. Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy

2. Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

3. Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands

4. Department of Neurology, The Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

5. Brainstrust (The Brain Cancer People), Cowes, Isle of Wight, UK

6. Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland

7. Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

8. Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

9. Department of Radiation Sciences and Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

10. Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

11. Department of Internal Medicine I, Clinical Division of Medical Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

12. Department of Neuroscience, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK

13. Department Neurology, University Clinic St Pölten, KLPU and KLI-Neurology and Neuropsychology, St Pölten, Austria

14. International Brain Tumour Alliance, Tadworth, UK

15. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

16. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

17. Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

18. Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy

19. Department of Palliative Care, Fondazione FARO, Turin, Italy

20. Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, US

21. Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

22. Neurology Clinic and National Centre for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

23. German Consortium of Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background Brain tumor patients are at high risk of impaired medical decision-making capacity (MDC), which can be ethically challenging because it limits their ability to give informed consent to medical treatments or participation in research. The European Association of Neuro-Oncology Palliative Care Multidisciplinary Task Force performed a systematic review to identify relevant evidence with respect to MDC that could be used to give recommendations on how to cope with reduced MDC in brain tumor patients. Methods A literature search in several electronic databases was conducted up to September 2019, including studies with brain tumor and other neurological patients. Information related to the following topics was extracted: tools to measure MDC, consent to treatment or research, predictive patient- and treatment-related factors, surrogate decision making, and interventions to improve MDC. Results A total of 138 articles were deemed eligible. Several structured capacity-assessment instruments are available to aid clinical decision making. These instruments revealed a high incidence of impaired MDC both in brain tumors and other neurological diseases for treatment- and research-related decisions. Incapacity appeared to be mostly determined by the level of cognitive impairment. Surrogate decision making should be considered in case a patient lacks capacity, ensuring that the patient’s “best interests” and wishes are guaranteed. Several methods are available that may help to enhance patients’ consent capacity. Conclusions Clinical recommendations on how to detect and manage reduced MDC in brain tumor patients were formulated, reflecting among others the timing of MDC assessments, methods to enhance patients’ consent capacity, and alternative procedures, including surrogate consent.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3